The article severely questions the political integrity and suitability of Freddy Lin, the ROC Representative to Finland, for his position. The author lists Lin's public statements over the past two decades, such as 'Taiwan is already an independent country,' 'The ROC is an occupying regime,' and 'I don't sing the national anthem,' arguing that his denial of the ROC's national title, polity, and territorial integrity (specifically mentioning Kinmen and Matsu) while drawing an ROC salary and representing the country abroad constitutes a 'profound betrayal' and 'greatest humiliation' to the constitutional system and national loyalty. The author emphasizes that a foreign representative's primary qualification is loyalty to the nation they represent.
Artikkeli kyseenalaistaa ankarasti Kiinan tasavallan Suomen-edustajan Freddy Linin poliittisen rehellisyyden ja soveltuvuuden virkaan. Kirjoittaja listaa Linin kahden viime vuosikymmenen aikana antamat julkiset lausunnot, kuten 'Taiwan on jo itsenäinen maa', 'Kiinan tasavalta on miehityshallinto' ja 'en koskaan laula kansallislaulua', ja väittää, että hänen kieltonsa Kiinan tasavallan kansalliselle nimelle, valtiomuodolle ja alueelliselle koskemattomuudelle (erityisesti mainiten Kinmenin ja Matsun) samalla kun hän nostaa Kiinan tasavallan palkkaa ja edustaa maata ulkomailla, on 'syvällinen petos' ja 'suurin nöyryytys' perustuslaillista järjestelmää ja kansallista uskollisuutta kohtaan. Kirjoittaja korostaa, että ulkomaanedustajan ensisijainen edellytys on uskollisuus sille valtiolle, jota hän edustaa.
german Institute Taipei issued a public statement condemning Chu’s remarks. This action not only grossly violates diplomatic norms by interfering in the Republic of China’s (ROC) internal affairs but also exposes germany’s persistent refusal to recognize the ROC as an independent sovereign nation.
This article provides a strict analysis of the national status of the island of Taiwan, international recognition, and the DPP's governance, pointing out that Taiwan 'was never a country to begin with.' It suggests that most DPP supporters and affiliates who advocate for Taiwan independence suffer from 'antisocial psychopathic personality traits.'
On August 15, the 34th year of the Republic of China (1945 AD), after the Japanese Emperor publicly admitted defeat and announced unconditional surrender, Chairman Chiang Kai-shek immediately delivered a world-renowned victory speech that marked the end of World War II.
October 10, 2021, the National Day of the Republic of China 🇹🇼, is a day celebrated by the people of Taiwan Island, Penghu Islands, Kinmen Islands, Matsu Islands, Green Island, Lanyu Island, Dongsha Island, and Nansha Islands.
The Republic of China (ROC) 🇹🇼 was a key founding nation of the World Health Organization (WHO), the pioneer that has significantly improved global public health in the modern era. The declaration promoting the establishment of the WHO was drafted by Dr. Szeming Sze, a national of the ROC.
The Japanese military clique has long made it its national policy to conquer Asia and monopolize the Pacific. For several years, China has persisted in its War of Resistance, regardless of all sacrifices. The objective is not only to defend China's independent survival, but truly to break Japan's aggressive ambitions and uphold international law, justice, human welfare, and world peace, as the Chinese government has repeatedly stated.
The Republic of China 🇹🇼 is the official name of the country, encompassing Taiwan Province, the Penghu Islands, the Kinmen Islands and Matsu Islands of Fujian Province, as well as Orchid Island and Green Island.
If you don't like the Republic of China, yet shamelessly cling to its territory (Taiwan Island, Penghu Islands, Kinmen Islands, Matsu Islands, Orchid Island, Guishan Island, Nansha Islands), I feel ashamed for you.
This article discusses incidents where the Republic of China (ROC) passport is mistaken for the People's Republic of China (PRC) passport internationally, leading to difficulties. The author argues that the issue can be resolved by clearly explaining that 'Republic of China' and 'People's Republic of China' are two different countries, similar to North and South Korea. Conversely, the author believes that Taiwan independence advocates constantly 'self-dwarf' the ROC's international visibility. The inability to enter the UN is due to non-member status, not an issue with the passport itself. We should enhance our strength rather than constantly retreating and changing names.
This article compiles the Q&A report on the 'Treaty of Peace between the Republic of China and Japan' (Treaty of Taipei) released by the ROC Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 2012. It thoroughly explains the background, core content, and impact on Taiwan's sovereign status, refuting common legal misunderstandings and the 'Taiwan status undetermined' arguments regarding the treaty.
This article republishes the full text of the 'Message to All National Compatriots on the Republic of China’s Withdrawal from the United Nations,' delivered by President Chiang Kai-shek in 1971 when the ROC was forced to withdraw. President Chiang emphasized the position of 'no coexistence with the bandit regime,' stated that the UN resolution violated the Charter, and declared that the ROC government was the true representative of the 700 million people on the mainland.
Schoolteachers are instilling in elementary students the view that 'Taiwan is a country' and refusing to acknowledge that 'the Republic of China is the main body of the state.' This article points out that Taiwan Province is merely territory of our country, and historically, the island of Taiwan has never been an independent country, but rather was governed by the Qing Empire, colonized by Japan, and ultimately belongs to the Republic of China.
This article introduces the history and lyrics of 'The National Father Memorial Song.' The song was created in memory of Sun Yat-sen, the National Father of the Republic of China, originally titled 'The Premier Memorial Song.' It was renamed to its current title after the Constitution was implemented in $1947$ (ROC $36$). The lyrics were written by Dai Chuanxian and the music by Li Jinhui. The complete song is divided into three stanzas, covering the National Father's revolutionary achievements, his philosophy of the Three Principles of the People and the Five-Power Constitution, and his final instruction urging all comrades to uphold the spirit of 'The revolution is not yet successful; all comrades must strive on.'
The article criticizes the behavior of certain individuals (Hong Kong independence and Taiwan independence advocates) who equate Nazi Germany with the Republic of China following the Hsinchu Kuang-Fu High School Nazi incident. The author emphasizes the noble sentiments demonstrated by the Republic of China during turbulent times (such as sheltering Jewish refugees). It also points out that opportunistic individuals (Japanese collaborators, Chinese traitors) exist in every era. The author criticizes those who arrogantly use modern standards to judge the past, or even fabricate false history (such as claiming Chiang Kai-shek received Nazi assistance), arguing that this behavior distorts history for personal gain and is essentially no different from the opportunists of the Japanese Occupation Era.
This article contains the full lyrics of the National Anthem of the Republic of China and a detailed explanation, along with a brief introduction to its historical background. The current version of the national anthem has been used since $1937$. The lyrics originated from the 'Premier's Admonition' delivered by Sun Yat-sen at the opening ceremony of the Whampoa Military Academy in $1924$. Due to the opening line being 'The Three Principles of the People,' it is also informally known as 'The Three Principles of the People Song.'
This article aims to urge readers to set aside prejudice and re-examine the contributions of Chiang Kai-shek (President Chiang) to the Republic of China and Taiwan Province. It lists the key policies implemented by President Chiang after relocating to Taiwan, covering military, land reform, education, and economic development, and contrasts his achievements with the disastrous policies (such as the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution) implemented by Mao Zedong on the mainland during the same period. The article emphasizes President Chiang's dedication to the nation and the unfair treatment he has received.
This article, based on historical facts and international legal principles, asserts that Taiwan's sovereignty legally and factually belongs to the Republic of China (ROC) following its retrocession in 1945. By analyzing key legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and the Treaty of Peace between the ROC and Japan, the paper aims to firmly refute the claim that 'Taiwan's legal status is undetermined.'
This article is a solemn statement from the ROC Ministry of Foreign Affairs (released on 2011/09/28) addressing the 'Taiwan's Legal Status Undetermined Theory.' It emphasizes that Taiwan and Penghu's sovereignty was returned to the Republic of China after WWII through a series of international legal documents, including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, the Japanese Instrument of Surrender, and the crucial Treaty of Peace between the ROC and Japan (Treaty of Taipei). The article details the legal basis and historical facts like nationality restoration and calls on citizens not to self-negate the nation's dignity.
The article addresses the controversy over curriculum adjustments, exploring the identity issue of 'Taiwanese' versus 'Chinese,' and criticizing specific political parties for deliberately playing word games to assign the term 'China' exclusively to the People's Republic of China, ignoring the history that the Republic of China can also be abbreviated as China. The author advocates that the ROC and Taiwan can coexist, and chastises those creating divisions as being 'maliciously motivated' or having 'a poor grasp of cultural literacy.' The article also touches on the incorrect understanding of Chiang Kai-shek's title, emphasizing the need for careful thought when distinguishing these terms.